Warts are benign neoplasms of viral nature in most cases. A papilla or nodule on the skin is nothing more than papillomatosis. Transmission occurs through direct contact or by using the patient's belongings. If a person has received psychotrauma, develops immunity, acrocyanosis, autonomic neurosis, sweaty feet and hands, the likelihood of such growths increases.
Modern methods of removing warts
In the main part of the article, we discuss the safe removal of warts, we review popular modern techniques. The method of treatment is selected with the help of the doctor, and postoperative control is also important for successful healing without complications.
Laser wart removal
How does laser wart removal work?
In modern clinics, specialists work with two types of laser equipment. The carbon dioxide (CO2) laser burns the wart tissue by vaporizing the moisture from the tissue. Erbium laser causes gradual vaporization of neoplasm structure. Pulsed laser destroys the capillaries of the warts, forming scar tissue.
Pros and cons of laser wart removal
Among the advantages of laser operations is protection of the skin surrounding the neoplasm from injury. The technique is not painful. The whole procedure usually takes a few minutes. Bleeding is excluded due to working with high temperature and soldering of blood vessels. The instruments do not touch the body, so the procedure is considered sterile. Treatment with bactericidal radiation accelerates tissue recovery after surgery. You can remove warts in just 1 session, recovery is fast.
Also, the benefits should include a minimum of contraindications, so the procedure is accessible to a wide range of patients. It is impossible to ignore the good results of removing neoplasms on the face and the whole body. At best, there are no visible scars. Undoubtedly, the advantage of this technique for removing warts is that in the process of burning pathological tissues with a laser, the performer easily adjusts the depth of exposure.
We turn to the negative aspects, among which it is impossible to send tissue for histological analysis. A disadvantage or feature is the difficulty in controlling the penetration depth of the laser beam. This is subject only to the best specialists. Laser destruction is often performed in one session, although a different approach is required if a person has very advanced neoplasms or conglomerates on the skin. After the wart is removed, several sessions are performed to make the wound smaller. Sometimes an allergy to anesthesia occurs during laser operations.
Reviews of laser wart removal
First look
Hello, I want to share my opinion by saying which is better - laser or nitrogen wart removal. I have tried both options. In the case of the nitrogen method, cold is applied for about half a minute. Complex cases take twice as long. I liked that the result appeared quite quickly. Although there were unpleasant sensations and even pain during the doctor's work, it became easier after the procedure.
I don't find nitrogen removal to be the most effective. The fact is that there is one more feature - sometimes from 3 to 5 repetitions are required to achieve the desired result. Against the background of this method, laser technology looks more perfect. I was more satisfied with the laser, because it is an express method, it is painless, it does not leave a mark. Although the laser moves to a significant depth in the thickness of the tissues, bleeding is completely excluded.
The specialist removed the neoplasm layer by layer and did not cause any damage to the skin.
A second look
Fortunately, I don't have skin problems, but this concern has affected my child. I believe that removal of warts and similar neoplasms in children is best done by laser. This is the most active and economical method. My son is 11 years old, so we were able to restore the skin quickly without peeling. At a younger age, parents should carefully monitor the child.
In no case is it recommended to tear off the shells before they fall off. Parents of especially concerned children are advised to cover the wound using a bactericidal patch.
Cryosurgery of warts and moles
How to remove warts with liquid nitrogen?
First, make-up is removed from the skin, if the effect is on the face, the problem area is treated with a special disinfectant composition. Then, a gel is applied, which helps soften the tissues and better impregnate them with nitrogen. Local anesthesia is used to relieve discomfort. Neoplasms are covered with an applicator - a small tube made of wood with a container at the end, from which liquid nitrogen comes.
The exposure time of the applicator is between 10 and 30 seconds, and contact is increased to 1 minute to remove plantar warts.
When pressed by the device, the liquid released from the working part freezes the neoplasm. In some cases, cryoprocessing equipment is used. This effect is aimed at eliminating certain types of papillomas and subcutaneous warts. During such treatment, the blister turns white and hardens without freezing. The final treatment allows to soften the skin and reduce negative feelings.
Blisters usually go away quickly after removing warts with nitrogen. If you follow all the doctor's recommendations, the skin will heal without any complications.
Pros and cons of frozen warts
The procedure with liquid nitrogen is similar to the freezing of pathological tissues. After melting, the wart breaks down at the cellular level. The main advantage of cryodestruction is a completely painless effect. It is not necessary to anesthetize the problem area. The operation is performed with nitrogen without bleeding and scars, in complete sterility. This technique is recommended for children more often than others.
The procedure also has disadvantages. One of them is that the doctor cannot regulate the depth of penetration of the active substance into the tissues. If a person has large neoplasms, it is required to carry out the procedure more than once. We also refer to the disadvantages that it is not possible to check the tissues after removal.
Reviews about removing warts with liquid nitrogen
First look
Hello to everybody. I went to the clinic to remove the so-called youth warts. In my case, there was no pressure on the neoplasm. The specialist made only a few light movements to the sides. Almost immediately, I noticed that the wart turned pale, then red, and edema appeared. A day later, it changed, in which a bubble appeared, first with blood, then with a light content.
It turned out that blisters are the norm after removing warts, I showed myself to the doctor, he forbade me to pierce it so as not to leave a scar. Then I noticed that after a week it was resolved, a crust formed. Then a pink spot was left where the wart once was. It was soon replaced by normal skin. I advise everyone to use nitrogen to remove neoplasms, if your doctor does not object.
A second look
I recently treated with nitrogen. Proper care after wart removal is important for quick healing and disinfection. The doctor advised me to lubricate the focus with 2% salicylic alcohol. I was able to remove tumors from my arms and legs.
I also want to warn people: this operation to freeze warts, nevi and other growths is contraindicated in case of exacerbation of skin, infectious or any chronic diseases during pregnancy. Be sure to check with your doctor about how to treat the wound after removal, which is best for your situation.
Removal of warts by electrocoagulation
The procedure requires minimal time, usually several small warts are removed in one session. The procedure takes a few seconds or a minute. Local anesthesia is performed for the comfort of the patient, antiseptic is applied to the skin. The doctor puts one loop of the device on the neoplasm, activates the current supply. The coagulant has a thermal effect on the wart and its tissues die.
Since this procedure is carried out at a temperature of 800 degrees, the blood vessels are cauterized, so the wound does not bleed. After electrocoagulation, a thick crust is formed, regeneration processes take place under it, and it falls off after a while.
Pros and cons of electrocoagulation of warts
You can find a lot of positive reviews about electrocoagulation on the network, because the procedure is not painful, the affected area heals well without a scar. In general, the technique is considered safe and effective, reasonably priced, and minimal blood loss.
The shortcomings are worth noting. Among the side effects, patients note itching, pain, burning. In most cases, discomfort occurs when the procedure is performed incorrectly, and an individual reaction to local anesthesia may also occur.
Reviews of electrocoagulation of warts
First look
During the procedure, the doctors asked me to remove all my metal jewelry from my body. Otherwise, I ran the risk of electrical burns. Each patient asks a specialist how well the wound heals, but it happens differently in all cases. In my case, the wound healed in 10 days. As soon as the peel came off, I noticed a small stain was left.
The location of the wart was quite deep, so the skin of this place remained light, although the spot became less visible over the years. In the case of superficial small neoplasms, it is easier because there are almost no traces. I also want to say what to do after removing the wart, they advised me: buy an antiseptic and apply it to the problem area for 5-10 days, do not moisten the wound and do not remove the crusts. There should be no relapse, I will hope for the best.
A second look
Hello. I was refused a wart removal by the electrocoagulation method, because during the examination it turned out that my blood coagulation was too low and the procedure was contraindicated for me. Be careful, pass all recommended tests. In addition to blood composition, contraindications include the acute phase of herpes, oncology, a serious condition against the background of chronic diseases, and individual intolerance to electrical effects.
Radio wave wart removal method
Pros and cons of radio wave wart removal
The procedure does not harm healthy tissue, lasts a maximum of 20 minutes, and there is no bleeding. The effect of the devices is not painful. Usually there are no complications, the rehabilitation period is minimized. No scars remain. Side effects such as wound inflammation, redness and swelling are very rare. The sterility of the procedure allows not to care for the wound after the removal of the mole. It is extremely important that the removed tissues can be examined histologically.
The radio wave technique is suitable for any area of the body - flat warts on the face or legs and other similar problems are removed equally well.
Disadvantages include skin discoloration in some cases, so the spot remains visible to others. Burns and blisters sometimes leave scars. For some, after removing the wart, it heals in a special way - a swelling appears in its place, and the pain bothers for a while. There is also a risk of damage to adjacent tissues.
Radio wave wart removal reviews
First look
I greet everyone. I had problems - warts in several parts of the body, I tried different methods, now the skin is clean. I want to compare radio wave treatment with the effect of liquid nitrogen. I can say with certainty that with nitrogen technology, blood bubbles are often visible, and with the radio wave method, this problem is excluded. After nitrogen cauterization, I was in severe pain for two days, and after removing a similar wart with a radio knife, almost nothing hurt.
I also want to note that after liquid nitrogen, the skin was scarred a few centimeters around the perimeter of the impact site, but not with the radio knife. After treatment with nitrogen, the blister burst, followed by a long healing period, lasting about 2 weeks, and the wound from the radio knife was hidden under the crust and healed in 6 days. Nitrogen technology left scars that were visible to the naked eye, and the radio knife left a faint scar in one area and no scar in another.
A second look
When I passed all the tests and went to the clinic for the procedure, I had to fill out a detailed questionnaire. It turned out that there is no radio wave effect in benign neoplasms during menstruation. I also have psoriasis since childhood, so I had to give up this method. It has many contraindications, in addition to those I have already mentioned.
Pharmaceutical preparations to remove warts
If you don't have enough money to go to a cosmetic surgery clinic or an elite medical center, try other methods of removing tumors. Before choosing a remedy to remove warts, you should consult a doctor and undergo the recommended examinations. According to the doctor's prescription, buy essential pharmacy products that work safely against papillomas.
If the drugs are used incorrectly, serious burns and all subsequent complications can occur. If the wound does not heal after self-burning the warts, you should urgently consult a doctor.
Of course, you can find many folk remedies on the net. Some sources suggest removing warts at home with the help of a celandine plant, others recommend treating the skin with vinegar. Perhaps this approach is effective, but it is better to entrust the removal of warts to professionals. Before and after photos clearly show the preference for surgery in the clinic. Any self-treatment involves risky and unpredictable actions.